council(draft): SecurityEngineer - add Round 6 docs review plan

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
council/SecurityEngineer
Council 2026-04-20 05:25:52 +08:00
parent 914e2a0fc3
commit c18e298a69
1 changed files with 43 additions and 0 deletions

43
plan.md
View File

@ -226,3 +226,46 @@ UPDATE vrt_power SET name = 'VR票务' WHERE HEX(name) LIKE '%E7A58A%';
```
详细安全分析见:`reviews/SecurityEngineer-round5-review.md`
---
## SecurityEngineer Round 6 — 文档评审
> 任务:对 Phase 2 相关 3 份文档进行评审
> 规则:只读文档,不读代码文件;不修改任何文件;不 push
### 待评审文档
| # | 文档 | 评审重点 |
|---|------|---------|
| D1 | `docs/14_TEMPLATE_RENDER_INVESTIGATION.md` | 数据流表名是否正确、Think驱动结论是否有效、解决方案是否合理 |
| D2 | `docs/PHASE2_PLAN.md` | 任务优先级、风险评估、决策点清晰度 |
| D3 | `docs/DEVELOPMENT_LOG.md`(第十一+十二章) | 事实准确性、时间线一致性、遗漏的关键信息 |
### 评审维度(每份文档覆盖)
1. **准确性** — 技术描述、数据流、表名是否正确
2. **完整性** — 是否遗漏边界条件/安全考量/依赖项
3. **可操作性** — 下一步行动是否清晰可执行
4. **一致性** — 各文档之间表名/文件路径/状态描述是否一致
5. **误导风险** — 是否有表述易让接手者误解
### 任务清单
- [ ] **D1-T1**: 评审 `docs/14_TEMPLATE_RENDER_INVESTIGATION.md` → 输出到 `reviews/SecurityEngineer-on-docs-review.md`
- [ ] **D1-T2**: 评审 `docs/PHASE2_PLAN.md` → 追加到 `reviews/SecurityEngineer-on-docs-review.md`
- [ ] **D1-T3**: 评审 `docs/DEVELOPMENT_LOG.md`(第十一+十二章)→ 追加到 `reviews/SecurityEngineer-on-docs-review.md`
- [ ] **D1-T4**: 综合建议 + Top 3 最需要修正的问题 → 追加到 `reviews/SecurityEngineer-on-docs-review.md`
- [ ] **D1-T5**: 合并评审结果到 `reviews/SecurityEngineer-on-docs-review.md` 并提交到 main
### 交付物
`reviews/SecurityEngineer-on-docs-review.md` — 三份文档各自的评分5维度+ 总体评价 + Top 3 修正建议
### 状态
- [ ] D1-T1 `[Claimed: council/SecurityEngineer]`
- [ ] D1-T2 `[Claimed: council/SecurityEngineer]`
- [ ] D1-T3 `[Claimed: council/SecurityEngineer]`
- [ ] D1-T4 `[Claimed: council/SecurityEngineer]`
- [ ] D1-T5 `[Claimed: council/SecurityEngineer]`